THE EMINENCE OF PRACTICALITY:
A SCIENTIFIC EXPLICATION
by Ian Haight
“We will not establish self-sustaining colonies in space for at least
the next hundred years, so we have to be very careful in this period.”
—Stephen Hawking
First begin with Asimov saying
science has given humanity visions
of the universe exceeding
all the beauty and majesty artists
ever made—and all the imaginings
of mythologists. Isn’t it true?
Gorgeous scientific pictures of nebulae
are available if one bothers
to explore and look; it’s easier
than the practice for any “mystical
vision.” On grounds of morality, we must
always remember that science never
dropped an atomic bomb, or released nerve
gas. Pure objective science needs no
credibility of compassion.
But in point of fact, its polio
cure is a marvelous vaccine. Mystery
can’t be found in the arrangement
of Japanese temple garden
rocks. Medial transformation
shows the Ryoanji Garden’s implicit
rock pattern to be a branching tree.
Certainly, it could not be a flanged straw-
broom, a sprig on a stem of Queen Anne’s
lace, or a long-stemmed mushroom. Artists
only dream of how old the cosmos
is. But an atomic clock keeps time
to within one minute over
10 billion years. Each isolated
atom is in every aspect
completely the same as any
other isolated atom,
and an element’s ions predictably
move. This renders them mini-timepieces.
Putting it simply, as an example,
oscillation makes the universe
one big clock. Particles
constantly colliding slightly alter atoms,
driving every clock to run slow over
time. This is why what science values
most is knowing the universe
is perpetually falling
into smithereens. The answer
is to create a field of complete force
that surrounds atoms, providing
softer interatomic bounces.
Finally, the pursuit of knowledge
is like a vote. To precisely
determine which vote is best to cast,
one must measure each vote’s potential
economic return. The method
for deciding what knowledge is most useful
is the same. In game theory, when every
human cooperates in a system,
they all receive benefits. But because
humans are individualistic,
they will not pursue the same goals.
Science, through its objectivity, is immune
to the mundanes of humanity; it exists
solely for the most eminently
practical pursuits.
Return to table of contents.